Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 19:50

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Top Federal Reserve official promises major overhaul of US bank regulation - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Dozens of Israeli children develop malignant tumors from sperm donor - The Jerusalem Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Scientists are experimenting with a completely new approach to combat human aging - Earth.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Channel Island pharmacists confirm digestion drug shortage - BBC
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Voluptatibus nesciunt enim provident in.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Who was the guy that had sex with the AIDS monkey?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
5 takeaways from Seahawks organized team activities | Analysis - The Seattle Times